Saturday, May 28, 2011
Took a break today, in a park we sometimes take the granddaughters to play. They have truly deluxe playground equipment. A feature on one of the sets of monkey bars consists of large plastic cylinders stacked on top of one another, with a pole running through a hole the middle of each of them. The cylinders spin very easily; on one side is a picture of a dinosaur, on the other side is the scientific name of the beast and the English name.
This one caught my eye:
And on the other side:
Ankylosaurus - The Bent Lizard.
Isn't that a great name for a recumbent? 'Course, I could never name one of my bikes that, I can hardly say it!
Posted by BluesCat at 12:14 PM
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
My gosh, we had another bicyclist killed yesterday afternoon:
Hit-and-run kills bicyclist in Avondale
Avondale is a town of about 85,000 just west of Phoenix. Quote from this news item:
"Avondale police received calls at about 1 p.m. after a man driving a green Ford Taurus on Van Buren Street near 107th Avenue struck a man on a bike and continued driving..."
Yeah, it figures, after all, it was only a bicyclist.
"The bicyclist was pronounced dead at the scene ... A witness followed the Taurus as it continued driving westbound on 107th Avenue ... Officers attempted to stop the auto near Van Buren and 123rd Avenue, but the man refused to yield, driving westbound into eastbound traffic on Van Buren and driving up onto curbs and sidewalks ... The car, apparently significantly damaged, began slowing, and two officers stopped the man by blocking his path with their patrol cars."
Uh oh, I bet I know WHY this guy tried to rabbit. Wait a minute, "Westbound on 107th Avenue"?? 107th Avenue goes north and south!
"The driver was taken to a hospital for injuries sustained during the incident and will be taken into custody upon his release ..."
So, anything else besides resisting arrest? Like maybe "defying the laws of physics by driving westbound on a road that goes north and south"?
"Police believe the man may have been impaired ..."
YEAH!? REALLY?!? "may have been impaired"? YA THINK???
Well, at least they didn't make me snort in anger by mentioning whether the bicyclist was wearing a helmet or not. Maybe that was because I think it's pretty obvious who's at fault here.
I'm wondering at the lack of interest of the writer of this article. Or maybe it is plain incompetence (sorta like not knowing which direction avenues go in the Phoenix metro area). I immediately thought of a few additional questions which could have been asked:
"When this driver is taken into custody, besides 'leaving the scene of a fatal accident,' are there any other charges which will be considered?"
"Did the driver say anything? Or offer any explanation?"
"Have there been any other bicycling fatalities in the area where this one occurred?"
I guess there are so many hot news items in Avondale that the death of a bicyclist just doesn't rate more than a few paragraphs.
Posted by BluesCat at 12:59 PM
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Saw a news article on AZ Central about a bicyclist who was killed last night:
Phoenix bicyclist struck by cars, dies
It has been a while since I've seen a news report on a bicyclist killed in an accident.
"The bicyclist, 58, whose name was not released, was riding his mountain bike about 7:15 p.m. in a northeast direction across 7th Street from Purdue when he was struck by a 1991 Nissan Pathfinder driven by a 46-year-old woman, whose name was not released. The Nissan was headed north."
For those unfamiliar with Phoenix, 7th Street runs north and south, and Purdue Avenue comes from the west and T's into 7th Street. The bike rider was riding at an angle, in a northeast direction, crossing 7th Street and was hit from behind by the Nissan headed north in one of the three northbound lanes; or maybe the driver was coming up in the center, left-turn only lane.
"The victim landed in front of a 2005 Ford Escape, also traveling north, driven by a 33-year-old man, whose name was not released.
The bicyclist was dragged under the Ford until the driver stopped. The victim received fatal injuries."
Yeow, so I envision the bicyclist struck from behind, and because his wheels are headed northeast he is boosted, rolling, into the next lane over where he is run over and dragged.
"Police said neither driver was impaired and no citations were issued."
Huh. So neither driver was impaired, and they weren't doing anything wrong because neither of them were cited. And the cops didn't cite the dead bicyclist, either!
I wonder what caused this accident? (Scratching my head)
AHA! There it is! In the last sentence of the article! The REASON this bicyclist was killed:
"The bicycle rider was not wearing a helmet."
There you have it, Kids! Wear your helmet and YOU may be able to survive a pair of SUV's tag-teaming you on a busy street!
( Author's disclaimer: BluesCat is a BIG fan of bicycle helmets, for practical reasons --- he has rearview mirrors on all of his --- as well as safety reasons. He is NOT a big fan of "journalists" who include such information in their articles because he feels it redirects attention from the REAL issues of bicycle safety. )
Posted by BluesCat at 4:00 PM
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Okay, okay, so it isn't through Hong Kong, but by Hong Kong ... the New Hong Kong restaurant, that is:
(giggle) I crack myself up ... Actually, I'm easily amused by myself. (That sounds somehow just wrong, don't it?)
No, all seriousness aside, I like this new route because it combines the crossing of two major arterial streets into one intersection.
Although I have nothing to back it up except for anecdotal incidents, it seems to me that the vast majority of my hair-raising exchanges with motor vehicles have taken place when we are meeting at the confluence of a major arterial and a collector street or a local road.
If I am the one on the arterial, and the motorist is the one turning right in front of me from a local road, more often than not I am the victim of the Invisible Two-Wheeled Vehicle Syndrome. They will pull out as if I'm not even there.
If I am the one making a right onto an arterial from a local road, the second he sees my blinking taillight, the motorist coming up behind me takes it as a signal to floor his gas pedal.
And motorists seem to have fewer qualms about blowing through a yellow light (or even a RED light) if the traffic signal is on a mere collector street crossing their MUCH more important path on a major road.
At the meeting of two major streets, even motorists seem to be paying more attention, and actually driving more cautiously, than anywhere else. Maybe it is the presence of all of the other big vehicles which can ruin their day if they collide with them. Or maybe it is all the pedestrians and city buses which are causing them to be more attentive.
Anybody else think that these intersections are safer for cyclists? Or am I all wet?
Posted by BluesCat at 9:08 AM
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Last Saturday, I went over to Scottsdale Fashion Square to look for a Mother's Day present for Mrs. Cat. For those unfamiliar with Fashion Square, it is a very tony shopping mall near downtown Scottsdale, Arizona.
I don't remember ever seeing anything which has to do with bicycles in Fashion Square. Maybe, because of the price of oil or because of Bike to Work Month, we've finally hit some kind of tipping point for the well-heeled. I saw two bicycles on display there. One was probably the most exotic commuter-type bike I have ever seen:
The other was part of the display for a tourism company:
Granted, they were displays, but at least there were BICYCLES in the Land of Mercedes and BMW, and you could actually BUY that green bike!
It was a woman's shop, and it was filled with women, and I was in a hurry to get Momma Cat's present, so I didn't stop in to get any details.
Anybody know what kind of bike that is?
Posted by BluesCat at 9:29 AM