Sunday, December 12, 2010
The Soleri Bridge
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Where Did YOU Go Today?
I was utilizing the Official BluesCat Communication System to surf the Web, visiting one of my favorite web sites: the Recumbent Riders Social Club. One of my buddies there, Rydabent, who lives up in Lincoln, NE, was bemoaning the fact that it was 28° up there and his Stratus recumbent was gathering dust. When I got back to the house, I couldn't help but rub it in when I replied:
"I feel your pain, Rydabent! When I read your post, it was a bone-numbing 63° F!
"After a couple cups of hot coffee and a hot Panini sandwich, I gutted it out and rode up to the bike shop ...
... "where I bought a pair of knee warmers in preparation for commuting at 5:30 AM during January and February.
"'Do you want to wear them ... now?' the gal asked, with a really strange, quizzical look on her face.
"I looked down at the thermometer on the bike computer of Bluetiful. It now read 68° F.
"'No,' I whimpered, 'I think I'm good.'
"(Sorry guy, the blast furnace that is a Phoenix summer does weird things to your head; I can't help but revel in the gorgeous fall and winter temps around here.)"
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Keira's First Trailer Ride
Pizza Delivery Bike
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Shocking Arizona Statistics
I've alway been suspicious of the 3.8% "fact." It never seemed to track right with my personal, anecdotal experience driving and biking in Phoenix. So, I went to the AZ Bike Law Blog - 2009 NHTSA Statistics.
There were a total of 25 car/bicycle fatalities in Arizona in 2009. I confirmed that in 11 of those accidents the rider was hit from behind. There are 3 other accidents which are sort of sketchy about what actually happened because, of course, the bicyclist is dead and there are no other witnesses. In only one of those 11 accidents did I find that the bicyclist was at fault because he swerved into traffic (although the reason he swerved is unclear). In three of the those fatal accidents the bike rider was in a marked bike lane.
Okay, so if you discount those three accidents in which my brief research could not discover the accident particulars, and even take out that one where the bicyclist swerved and "was at fault," that STILL leaves 10 accidents out of 25 when the bicyclist was in the "right" --- even riding in the bike lane on three occasions --- and was hit from behind.
But no matter WHO was at fault, that statistic means 44% of the bicyclists killed in Arizona in 2009 were hit from behind.
Does ANYBODY STILL want to argue with my contention that sometimes yer just flat safer on the sidewalk?
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Most traffic laws were created by people who drive, but don't bike; as a result those laws do not take into account the special vulnerability of bicyclists, pedestrians and even motorcyclists.
Hey! My fire extinguisher is still FULLY CHARGED!
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Here Come Da Traffic Law Judge
Y'all already know my take on riding on the sidewalk as a result of my comment about The Solidly Safer Sidewalk. I will say, without hesitation, that even if it were illegal to ride on the sidewalk in Phoenix (as it is in other communities around the world) I would still ride on the sidewalk and risk a ticket: in order to be safe, sometimes you just have to break a law which shouldn't apply to your vehicle in the first place.
The web site Bicycle Safety has this to say about Collision Type #10: The Rear End:
"A car runs into you from behind. This is what many cyclists fear the most, but it's actually not very common, comprising only 3.8% of collisions. However, it's one of the hardest collisions to avoid, since you're not usually looking behind you."
Uh, gee whiz, "only 3.8%," eh? Gosh, considering that there are around 600 bicyclists killed every year on American roads, 3.8% means we might have saved "only" around 23 lives every year if those folks could ride on the sidewalk. Not bad, eh? Unless, of course, you're one of a group of about 23 "special" people!
Here's a suggestion from Bicycle Safety about avoiding Collision Type #10: The Rear End:
"The best way to avoid getting Rear-Ended is to ride on very wide roads or in bike lanes, or on roads where the traffic moves slowly, and to use lights when biking at night." (Emphasis is mine.)
Note that NONE of those suggestions work for the road pictured in The Solidly Safer Sidewalk.
Here're some other comments from Bicycle Safety about Collision Type #10: The Rear End:
"Avoid busy streets. One of the biggest mistakes that people make when they start biking is to take the exact same routes they used when they were driving. It's usually better to take different streets with fewer and slower cars. Sure, cyclists have a right to the road, but that's a small consolation when you're dead. Consider how far you can take this strategy: If you learn your routes well, you'll find that in many cities you can travel through neighborhoods to get to most places, only crossing the busiest streets rather than traveling on them." (Emphasis is, again, mine.)
I would LOVE to find a different way to the destination of the photo in The Solidly Safer Sidewalk, but, no, my destination is on the south-west corner of an intersection of the busy north-south road you see in the photo and another, just as busy and bike unfriendly east-west road north of this location.
And that apartment complex you see on the right? Where that driveway is? If you think you could ride into the parking lot and exit out the back into the adjoining neighborhood you can think again: every single business or apartment complex south on this road, for over a half mile, has a solid, six-foot block wall running the entire length of their property.
The soonest you can get off of this road, to head west, is at that traffic signal you see about a quarter of a mile down the road. It leads into a credit union parking lot and from there into a neighborhood road.
Another law which I find inapplicable to bicyclists, for safety reasons, has to do with the one which proscribes "California Stops" at stop signs and stop lights.
I make no bones about my opinion on this: If I'm rolling up to a stop sign or a red stop light, and there is NO cross traffic, I will slow down but I will NOT stop.
The reason is simple: Starting and stopping are the two most vulnerable times on a bike. If these maneuvers ain't necessary, I ain't gonna do 'em, ESPECIALLY if some motorist is pulling up behind me in the traffic lane, and ESPECIALLY if it is dark.
Rather than go into my OWN, lengthy dissertation on this, I'll refer everybody to the excellent, informative and entertaining video presented by Urban Velo at Bicycle Rolling Stop Animation – Idaho Stop Law. (The ONLY quibble I have with the Urban Velo presentation is a minor semantic difference: they feel "blowing through a stop sign" is something you do at high speed, whereas I feel it is something you do as a result of disobeying the law at ANY speed.)
Most traffic laws were created by people who drive, but don't bike. As a result those laws do not take into account the special vulnerability of bicyclists, pedestrians and even motorcyclists.
Bring on the flames! I got my fire extinguisher at the READY!
Monday, September 20, 2010
Dos Amigos
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Tres Hermanos
Sunday, September 12, 2010
The Solidly Safer Sidewalk
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Bluetiful Is A Good Girl
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
AWOL Because of WORK
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
WTF was THAT??
Monday, July 12, 2010
A Canine Quandary
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Biking in the Arizona Heat
More Zoo Biking
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Crowded Parking
Poor Man's Front Panniers
Monday, June 14, 2010
The Living Desert
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Saturday Afternoon Ride Was A Bust
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Waiting for ... Godot?
Friday, June 4, 2010
Calling All Arizona Bicyclists
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Keira Discovers Bicycles
Sunday, May 30, 2010
AH! A True Holiday Sunday
Thursday, May 27, 2010
That's MY Lane
Saturday, May 22, 2010
A Better Computer Mount
Friday, May 21, 2010
Over the Century Mark at Last
Summer is here at last!
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Racing the ... Thermometer?
A Parked Flat
Sunday, May 16, 2010
One More Computer Story
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Bicycling Challenges
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Bike Computer Problems
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
BluesCat RV Test
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Bikes Unsafe in Drive-Thrus, Really?
Sunday, April 25, 2010
The BluesCat RV
Friday, April 23, 2010
Curses! Weatherman Foiled Me AGAIN!
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Bike the Zoo?
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Okay, Okay, I'll Be Fair With the New Computer
Sunday, April 11, 2010
New Computer for Bluetiful
Friday, April 9, 2010
RIP, Speedzone
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Need a New Weatherman
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Altercation With A Motorist
He and I have been playing "telephone tag" ever since. He would call my home telephone number when I was not there, I would get the message and return his call when he was gone for the day. If only I could have given him my mobile number, but I was hesitant to do that because my three-year-old Motorola Q had started giving me problems. Finally, I acquired a brand New Communication System and was able to leave a voice message and an email with my cell phone number.
I didn't think anything about it for about a week, and then last Friday (March 26, 2010) my mobile phone rang and I saw “Private Number” as the source of the call. My own home phone number shows as “Private Number,” so I answered it fully expecting to hear my wife's voice. Luckily, I didn't answer it as a “Reverse Obscene Phone Call” (as I have been known to do) because the voice at the other end of the line was that precinct commander. He and I exchanged pleasantries and we both expressed how happy we were we could finally talk.
He continued by saying he hoped I would accept the apologies of the Phoenix Police Department, and his personal apology, for the actions of his officer that day. He explained that his research into the incident showed that I was correct about being in that lane, that was where I was supposed to be stopped in order to continue east across the street when the traffic cleared.
That answered my first question, which had been “Where was I supposed to be if not there?” My second question was “What training do Phoenix police officers get regarding the traffic laws pertaining to bicycles?” The answer to that question exposed the heart of the problem regarding the officer's mistaken instructions to me and his belief that I “didn't belong there.”
At the academy, police cadets get twenty hours of training regarding Title 28 – Transportation of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Title 28 covers ALL the laws regarding vehicles, licensing, traffic laws, truck transportation, fees, etc. It is a section of the ARS which takes up about 619 pages of the “condensed” version available at the local libraries. The academy emphasizes those sections which deal with the most important parts to policemen: DUI laws, rules governing traffic stops, search and seizure, licensing penalties, etc.
The precinct commander said when he got my email, he was almost embarrassed to admit he had to pull out Title 28 and review the portion of the ARS to which I had referred in my message. The fact that bicycles were historically such a small percentage of the traffic, and that these issues rarely came up, was what caused the incorrect actions on the part of the police officer I encountered.
I responded to the commander by saying I fully appreciated how important the other jobs were for the police, and when he asked if I wished to speak to the officer I assured him that my intent was certainly not to have him call some officer on the carpet about this; my concern was for my safety as a bicyclist and support by the police for my rights on the roadway as a bicyclist.
I then asked if he would like me to check around at the various area bike clubs, and with The League of American Bicyclists, for any training they could provide for the police. He replied he would be happy to champion my efforts with his department, would keep me informed about progress on the subject and looked forward to hearing from me.
I guess I have really stuck my foot into it now! LOL! I'll probably have to renew my membership in the League and track down one of their trainers in the area. Actually, I feel good about it.
Now THAT'S a Pothole!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)